1.1 / February 14, 2017
(4.9/5) (12)
Loading...

Description

(1)本書注重《聖經》的一貫性、完整性,藉以經解經說明新、舊約關係之密切,且希望讀者讀完本書後,能對《聖經》獲得若干程度完整性的概念。(2)本書完全偏重《聖經》實例的解釋,因《聖經》基本上是教導人如何遵行神的話,是實行神旨的書,不是滿足人之理性的書。《聖經》中的理論與辯解,也都是為教人如何遵行的。(3)本書不引用或批判歷史上眾神仆的解經,因他們對自己的主張,既無法再作任何解釋,而後人對他們的批判,又未必完全客觀或公平,或舍長取短,或斷章取義。然後又把現今異己之見解,歸為已判定是錯誤的歷史先例之中,不容置辯。結果容易使人以歷史上神學家之見解為衡量解經之標準,而輕忽了重回《聖經》真理方面加以思考。(4)本書注重新約如何引用舊約。並認為新約《聖經》中的主耶穌與使徒,既然是希伯來人所生的希伯來人,又在舊約《聖經》的文化薰陶下長大,他們對舊約的引用和領會,就是解釋舊約的最大權威,最有力的根據。此外,沒有更大的權威。5)本書認為正確地留意上下文與《聖經》之一貫見解的"以經解經",就是最穩妥的解經原則。因為這是所有人都能運用的原則(除非有基督徒自己不肯這樣研讀《聖經》)。《聖經》既是給曆世歷代人的一本經書,它必然是所有"從神生"的人都可以讀得明白的書。絕不是只有某些特別階層的人才讀得明。若有人不明白《聖經》,是因他不肯倚靠聖靈的指教去讀,不肯付出必須付的代價去讀,不是不能明白。(6)本書重視《聖經》中的歷史背景,看作是遠較《聖經》以外的歷史背景更有助於正確的瞭解《聖經》的根據。任何歷史的片斷被選記在《聖經》中之後,最重要的不是當時的風俗習慣如何。讀《聖經》的人不應規限《聖經》所引用的歷史片斷,只許有當時習俗之意義,而忽視了《聖經》選記該片斷史事的目的所要說明的是什麼。(7)本書認為某些經文,必須按屬靈的實意(即靈意)領會,且是《聖經》自己的釋經法。按屬靈的實意解經,絕不是人意或私意的解經,不該相提並論,更不應借醜化靈意影射屬靈。本書對預言解釋,較一般更強調應按字句實意應驗,不應隨意象徵化,或憑人意推理化。書中列舉不少這類例解,亟待主內兄姊賜正。(1)pay attention to the book "Bible" consistency, integrity, in orderto explain the new interpretation by the Old Testament of the closerelationship and hope that readers after reading this book, can beon the "Bible" to get some degree of integrity concepts.(2) Thebook is completely biased interpretation of the "Bible" instance,because "the Bible" is basically to teach people how to comply withGod's Word, is the implementation of the purpose of God's book, notto meet the people's rational book. "Bible" in theory andjustification, are also to teach people how to comply with the.(3)does not refer to or criticize the book on the history of the godsservant exegesis, for their support of their claims, then neitherany explanation, then people criticize them, they may not beentirely objective or fair, or taking short relinquish strengths orout of context. Then again today alien's opinion, in the finaljudgment is wrong as historical precedents among unequivocal. Theresults people are likely to view the history of theologians, asmeasured by the standard solution, and the neglect of the return tothe "Bible" Truth regard to thinking.(4) focus on new book abouthow to refer to the Old Testament. And that the New Testament"Bible" in the Lord Jesus and the apostles, since it is the Hebrewof the Hebrews, but also in the Old Testament "Bible" culturenurtured grow their Old Testament references and understanding,interpretation of the Old Testament is the greatest authority,according to the most powerful. In addition, there is no greaterauthority.5) The book argues that with proper attention to thecontext of the "Bible" of the consistent view of the "de-Jing", isthe most secure principles of interpretation. Because this is theprinciple everyone can use (unless there is a Christian does notwant to read this "Bible"). "Bible" is the man for the ages of oneby the book, it must be all "born of God" who can read the book tounderstand. Is not only some particular class people read out. Ifpeople do not understand the "Bible", because he refused to trustin the Holy Spirit enlighten read, refused to pay the price to bepaid to read, can not understand.(6) pay attention to the book"Bible" in the historical background, is seen as far morehistorical background of the "Bible" more than help correctunderstanding of the "Bible" according to. After the pieces of anyhistorical record is selected in the "Bible", the most importantthing is not how the customs of the time. Read the "Bible" of thepeople should not be subject to the "Bible" piece of history cited,we can only have meaning at the time of customs, while ignoring the"Bible" of the election in mind what is the purpose of thefragments of historical events to be described.(7) The book arguesthat certain passages must be real spiritual meaning (ie,spiritually) comprehend, and is the "Bible" own exegesis. Realmeaning by spiritual exegesis, not a selfish person intended orexegesis, should not be compared, and should not vilify spirituallythrough spiritual mapping. This book of prophecy interpretation,more general wording should be more emphasis on real meaningfulfilled and should not be arbitrary symbolic or reasoning withpeople of Italy. The book lists a number of these cases thesolution, urgently Lord give positive siblings.

App Information 以經解經

  • App Name
    以經解經
  • Package Name
    tw.idv.martinsu.www_B2B
  • Updated
    February 14, 2017
  • File Size
    1.3M
  • Requires Android
    Android 2.2 and up
  • Version
    1.1
  • Developer
    蘇江村
  • Installs
    5,000+
  • Price
    Free
  • Category
    Education
  • Developer
  • Google Play Link

蘇江村 Show More...

以經解經 1.1 APK
蘇江村
(1)本書注重《聖經》的一貫性、完整性,藉以經解經說明新、舊約關係之密切,且希望讀者讀完本書後,能對《聖經》獲得若干程度完整性的概念。(2)本書完全偏重《聖經》實例的解釋,因《聖經》基本上是教導人如何遵行神的話,是實行神旨的書,不是滿足人之理性的書。《聖經》中的理論與辯解,也都是為教人如何遵行的。(3)本書不引用或批判歷史上眾神仆的解經,因他們對自己的主張,既無法再作任何解釋,而後人對他們的批判,又未必完全客觀或公平,或舍長取短,或斷章取義。然後又把現今異己之見解,歸為已判定是錯誤的歷史先例之中,不容置辯。結果容易使人以歷史上神學家之見解為衡量解經之標準,而輕忽了重回《聖經》真理方面加以思考。(4)本書注重新約如何引用舊約。並認為新約《聖經》中的主耶穌與使徒,既然是希伯來人所生的希伯來人,又在舊約《聖經》的文化薰陶下長大,他們對舊約的引用和領會,就是解釋舊約的最大權威,最有力的根據。此外,沒有更大的權威。5)本書認為正確地留意上下文與《聖經》之一貫見解的"以經解經",就是最穩妥的解經原則。因為這是所有人都能運用的原則(除非有基督徒自己不肯這樣研讀《聖經》)。《聖經》既是給曆世歷代人的一本經書,它必然是所有"從神生"的人都可以讀得明白的書。絕不是只有某些特別階層的人才讀得明。若有人不明白《聖經》,是因他不肯倚靠聖靈的指教去讀,不肯付出必須付的代價去讀,不是不能明白。(6)本書重視《聖經》中的歷史背景,看作是遠較《聖經》以外的歷史背景更有助於正確的瞭解《聖經》的根據。任何歷史的片斷被選記在《聖經》中之後,最重要的不是當時的風俗習慣如何。讀《聖經》的人不應規限《聖經》所引用的歷史片斷,只許有當時習俗之意義,而忽視了《聖經》選記該片斷史事的目的所要說明的是什麼。(7)本書認為某些經文,必須按屬靈的實意(即靈意)領會,且是《聖經》自己的釋經法。按屬靈的實意解經,絕不是人意或私意的解經,不該相提並論,更不應借醜化靈意影射屬靈。本書對預言解釋,較一般更強調應按字句實意應驗,不應隨意象徵化,或憑人意推理化。書中列舉不少這類例解,亟待主內兄姊賜正。(1)pay attention to the book "Bible" consistency, integrity, in orderto explain the new interpretation by the Old Testament of the closerelationship and hope that readers after reading this book, can beon the "Bible" to get some degree of integrity concepts.(2) Thebook is completely biased interpretation of the "Bible" instance,because "the Bible" is basically to teach people how to comply withGod's Word, is the implementation of the purpose of God's book, notto meet the people's rational book. "Bible" in theory andjustification, are also to teach people how to comply with the.(3)does not refer to or criticize the book on the history of the godsservant exegesis, for their support of their claims, then neitherany explanation, then people criticize them, they may not beentirely objective or fair, or taking short relinquish strengths orout of context. Then again today alien's opinion, in the finaljudgment is wrong as historical precedents among unequivocal. Theresults people are likely to view the history of theologians, asmeasured by the standard solution, and the neglect of the return tothe "Bible" Truth regard to thinking.(4) focus on new book abouthow to refer to the Old Testament. And that the New Testament"Bible" in the Lord Jesus and the apostles, since it is the Hebrewof the Hebrews, but also in the Old Testament "Bible" culturenurtured grow their Old Testament references and understanding,interpretation of the Old Testament is the greatest authority,according to the most powerful. In addition, there is no greaterauthority.5) The book argues that with proper attention to thecontext of the "Bible" of the consistent view of the "de-Jing", isthe most secure principles of interpretation. Because this is theprinciple everyone can use (unless there is a Christian does notwant to read this "Bible"). "Bible" is the man for the ages of oneby the book, it must be all "born of God" who can read the book tounderstand. Is not only some particular class people read out. Ifpeople do not understand the "Bible", because he refused to trustin the Holy Spirit enlighten read, refused to pay the price to bepaid to read, can not understand.(6) pay attention to the book"Bible" in the historical background, is seen as far morehistorical background of the "Bible" more than help correctunderstanding of the "Bible" according to. After the pieces of anyhistorical record is selected in the "Bible", the most importantthing is not how the customs of the time. Read the "Bible" of thepeople should not be subject to the "Bible" piece of history cited,we can only have meaning at the time of customs, while ignoring the"Bible" of the election in mind what is the purpose of thefragments of historical events to be described.(7) The book arguesthat certain passages must be real spiritual meaning (ie,spiritually) comprehend, and is the "Bible" own exegesis. Realmeaning by spiritual exegesis, not a selfish person intended orexegesis, should not be compared, and should not vilify spirituallythrough spiritual mapping. This book of prophecy interpretation,more general wording should be more emphasis on real meaningfulfilled and should not be arbitrary symbolic or reasoning withpeople of Italy. The book lists a number of these cases thesolution, urgently Lord give positive siblings.
聖經疑問集 1.0.1 APK
蘇江村
本聖經疑問集內容採網路上收集之資料,彙整後重新編排,改寫為APP程式。舊約內容選自【李道生】著,《舊約聖經問題總解上、下》(浸會出版社) ,共202題。新約內容選自【蘇佐揚】著,《新約聖經難題上、下》(基督教天人社),共511題。新舊約共有713題疑問解答,提供您閱讀聖經時的參考資料。 聖經上的話你們應當查考聖經,因你們以為內中有永生,給我作見證的,就是這經(約五39)。這地方的人,賢于帖撒羅尼迦的人,甘心領受這道,天天考查聖經,要曉得這道是與不是(徒十七11)。耶和華阿!求你將你的道指教我。我要照你的真理行。求你使我專心敬畏你的名(詩八六11)。求你開我的眼睛,使我看出你律法中的奇妙(詩一一九18)。我要自由而行,因我素來考究你的訓詞(詩一一九45)。你的言語一解開,就發出亮光,使愚人通達(詩一一九130)。只等真理的聖靈來了,他要引導你們明白一切的真理,因為他不是憑自己說的,乃是把他所聽見的都說出來,並要把將來的事告訴你們(約十六13)。耶和華阿!你的話安定在天,直到永遠(詩一一九89)。
Loading...